I’m going to get this out of the way right now. If you’re
struggling with your dissertation‑and even if you’re not‑I recommend getting a
hold of a copy of Writing Your
Dissertation in Fifteen Minutes a Day by Joan Bolker. The title is a bit of
a misnomer, as Bolker recommends that you write for AT LEAST fifteen minutes
every day, especially on days when you’re having trouble. I’ve only just
started it, and I’m already feeling tons better about my writing process,
though I was literally shaking when I began reading it, because I felt as
though I had been going about my dissertation all wrong. But that sensation
passed as I confronted and worked through that feeling and decided to rethink my approach from here on out rather than feel badly about my approach up to that point.
My job isn’t to plug books I’m reading, so I’m not going to
give an in‑depth recap of the lessons that Bolker provides her readers. But I
do want to spend some time discussing how my process has changed‑for the
better, I think‑over the last several days. I’ve had quite a few issues with my
writing. Most if not all of these issues are pretty typical ones. They’re the
same fears that everyone I know who has gone through this process has had: fear
that I am going to write a boring or unreadable dissertation; fear that I am
not going to contribute to the body of knowledge about my topic (and it turns
out the body of knowledge already out there is small, though it is not
completely non‑existent); fear that I’m not going to finish in time (I have
until December 2012, but I want to finish by June); fear that I don’t know what
I’m writing about; and on and on. In short, I’ve been putting a lot of pressure
on myself to perform. I know that I’ve been doing this‑I’ve had plenty of
conversations with friends in my department and with my dissertation advisor
about it‑, but I hadn’t directly confronted my fears myself, and I think
what I needed to do was put them into writing, put them into my own words
rather than simply listen to what everyone else was telling me, though that was
an important step. I hadn’t asked myself why I had all these irrational fears
and whether or not there was something about my process that was causing me to
feel this way. And I believe my process was holding me back to an extent.
I think we all eventually figure out some tricks to forming
dissertation writing habits. Some of these are picking a certain time of day to
write (mornings work best for me); picking a good space or spaces in which to
write (e.g., a coffee shop); deciding on realistic writing goals for each day, and so on. I had tried
all of these things, but I was still writing very slowly, if I was able to
write at all. Many days I would stare at the words on the
screen with disgust, shame, guilt that I hadn’t written more, and so on. Even
if I stopped to ‘organize’ my thoughts and write without censoring myself, the
problem would quickly return once I tried to go back to the way I had been
writing. Part of the problem was that, even if I took a break from my normal
routine, I had established a pattern of thinking about my writing as ‘good’ or
‘bad’. Another stumbling block was that I had set myself a specific amount of
words to write each day. This isn’t a horrible way to set up a writing goal,
per se, but I had noticed that it took me quite a few more words per page than
what is considered average. Each page felt like a struggle because I was
focused on how many more words I had to write than what is average.
I’ve done a few things to correct these problems already.
For instance, I’ve shifted from word count to page count as my writing goal
each day. I’ve also started writing about
my process each day in addition to my dissertation writing goal. This obviously
means I need to write MORE each day than I had been, but I’ve also begun
forming a new habit of not censoring myself at all whenever I sit down to write
dissertation pages. This is a very new approach for me in terms of academic
writing (I’ve done it with creative writing), as I’ve long been what a former
professor of mine has called an eeker. I would eek out a page a day, sometimes
less, and rarely more, but these pages would already be in pretty good shape
and not require much revision. I’ve written this way for years, mostly with
success. But it hasn’t been working with my dissertation, so I’ve decided I’m
going to be what that same professor called a gusher. This type of writer
gushes onto the page and doesn’t worry about style, format, spelling or anything that gets in the way of productive thought. I’ve
always felt this kind of writing was counter intuitive or inefficient. And
perhaps it is counter intuitive. But I’m not sure anymore that it is
inefficient. For one thing, it allows me to directly engage my thoughts rather
than worry about writing in a linear fashion, which is also one of the eeker’s
habits (or at least it’s one of mine). And in many ways it is a much more
creative approach to writing, because it allows me to slap down ideas and make
connections that I might not have otherwise noticed. Writing that incorporates
a creative element very much appeals to me, so much so that, even though I’ve
only been writing this way for a short time, I’m not sure how I ever got by
writing differently. And the best part is that this kind of writing is stress
free. I’m breaking my writing up into manageable blocks: a few pages on process
when I wake up; a short break; then a few pages on the dissertation. I’m adding
writing a blog entry in the early evening to this routine. I’ll reward myself
with the evening off once I finish said entry.
Another really important lesson I’ve learned in a very short
time is to begin owning my dissertation. I’ve always known this dissertation is
mine, but I haven’t treated it as though it is mine. Without realizing I had
been doing so, I had been treating it as something to be turned in to my
committee, chapter by chapter (and I haven’t yet turned a single full chapter
in, though I am becoming much more confident that I can do so soon) and then a
final draft to be judged, assessed, and so on. I think this view of my
dissertation, as something to be turned in rather than as mine, is why I have
been thinking that my dissertation is boring, not up to par (and, incidentally,
the feedback I have received from my advisor so far has been positive), and all
of those negative thoughts. For instance, it could turn out that MY
dissertation is very straight forward. But why does that have to be a problem?
Why does it have to be a weakness? Why can’t it be a strength? I think asking
even simple questions like this says a great deal about what my mindset has
been and what I need to do to change that. I don’t necessarily think overcoming
that negative mindset will be easy, but I think taking ownership of whatever my
dissertation turns out to be is a critical step, perhaps the most critical
step, that I need to take. As cheesy at it may sound in writing, telling myself
that this dissertation is my dissertation and that nobody can take it away from
me is something I want to do and remind myself of on those days when, unlike
today, I am not able to write so effortlessly. Owning it will also allow me to
step back and look at the stumbling block(s) I encounter on a particular day, whether it is
guilt or shame; worrying about things in my personal life and letting that get
in the way of writing; wrestling with a particular issue or question (which
perhaps can be approached a different way or put aside for a while).
I don’t think I’ve written anything particularly earth
shattering in this entry. That was not my goal. Rather, my objective was to put
down in words what I’ve been going through, to acknowledge it on the page, and
to put it in the public sphere. In many ways, deciding to own my dissertation
is about accountability. But even more importantly, I think owning my
dissertation is about not having to apologize to myself or anyone else about
what my dissertation is or turns out to be.
4 comments:
this is good, greg! i'm totally a gusher, though i used to be more of an eeker. i had a really crappy day with an article i got some feedback on from my committee member. it's good feedback, but it made me feel like i had worked so hard and written only garbage. hopefully tomorrow will be better. i'm so glad you found Writing Your Dissertation in 15 Minutes a Day useful!!
I'm sorry you had such a crappy day. We can talk about it in detail sometime if you like. If you haven't read Writing Your Dissertation in 15 Minutes a Day yet, it also offers some good advice on how to discuss with committee members the way they frame their feedback can impact your process negatively. I don't see why you can't apply this to feedback on an article as well.
I think I told you to read that book. ;) Anyway, I read it, but it still hit me. I think it's fine -- once I started revising, the article seems ok. Not perfect, but good enough to send out.
You are so interesting! I do not believe I've truly read something like that before. So nice to discover someone with original thoughts on this issue. Seriously.. many thanks for starting this up. This site is something that is required on the web, someone with a little originality!
Here is my website :: affordable health insurance
Post a Comment